The Claas Lexion 8900 and John Deere X9 are two of the most advanced harvesters on the market today. With their powerful engines and robust design, both harvesters have earned a reputation for reliability and durability. The Lexion 8900 is a combine harvester, designed to be used on larger farms and industrial settings, offering a wide range of harvesting and processing capabilities. The John Deere X9, meanwhile, is a forage harvester, perfect for smaller farms and operations, and provides the operator with the ability to harvest and process multiple kinds of crops. Both harvesters offer efficient harvesting, with numerous options for customizing the operation to suit any situation.
Claas Lexion 8900 Vs John Deere X9 Specs
Claas Lexion 8900
– Engine Size: 608 hp
– Grain Processing Capacity: 11,000 bushels per hour
– Combine Size: 35.5 ft
– Grain Tank Size: 13,440 L
– Separator Type: Rotor
– Chaffing System: Opti-Clean
– Unloading System: Double-Auger Unloading System
– Steering Types: Terrain-Tracer GPS or Manual
John Deere X9
– Engine Size: 540 hp
– Grain Processing Capacity: 8,700 bushels per hour
– Combine Size: 44 ft
– Grain Tank Size: 9,918 L
– Separator Type: Dual-Sieve
– Chaffing System: Quiet Shutdown System
– Unloading System: Hydraulic Unloading System
– Steering Types: Automated Total Automation or Manual
Conclusion:
In terms of sheer power and production, the Claas Lexion 8900 is the clear winner, boasting a 608 hp engine and a processing capacity of 11,000 bushels per hour. The John Deere X9 is still a valuable machine with a 540 hp engine and a 8,700 bushels per hour processing capacity. The John Deere X9 also offers a 44 ft combine size compared to the Lexion 8900’s 35.5 ft, but the latter offers a much larger grain tank of 13,440 L. The Lexion 8900 also offers an Opti-Clean chaffing system and a double-auger unloading system for increased efficiency, whereas the John Deere X9 boasts a quieter shutdown system and a hydraulic unloading system. Lastly, both machines offer a choice between terrain-tracer GPS steering or manual steering, but the Lexion 8900 also has the option of automated total automation.
Claas Lexion 8900 Vs John Deere X9 Features
Claas Lexion 8900 Features:
-Slope-sensitive combine operation
-355hp engine
-Easy-to-use, advanced operation system
-High-performance harvesting capabilities
-Intelligent crop flow system
-Grain tank size of up to 14,000 liters
John Deere X9 Features:
-370hp engine
-Durable, advanced threshing system
-Precision agricultural technology
-Grain tank size of up to 18,000 liters
-Powerful, adjustable intelligent exhaust
-Fuel efficiency enhancements
In conclusion, the Claas Lexion 8900 and John Deere X9 are both high-performance models in the combine harvester market. The Lexion offers a 355hp engine and a 14,000-liter grain tank. The X9 has a slightly more powerful engine of 370hp, as well as an 18,000-liter grain tank. Both models have precision agricultural technologies, but the X9 offers fuel efficiency enhancements and an adjustable intelligent exhaust, while the Lexion has a slope-sensitive combine operation.
Claas Lexion 8900 Vs John Deere X9 Maintenance
The Claas Lexion 8900 and the John Deere X9 are two models of combine harvesters. Both harvesters need different types of maintenance in order to remain operational. The Claas Lexion 8900 requires regular cleaning of the threshing drum and separation system. The cutting bar should also be greased regularly. The operator should periodically check the oil and filter and top it up if needed. The harvester’s air filter should be cleaned and changed every 250 operating hours. The tracks should be checked frequently and replaced when necessary. The John Deere X9 needs to be inspected as well as serviced throughout the harvesting season for optimal performance. The cutting bar should be regularly oiled and the threshing elements should be kept clean. Additionally, it is important to check the compression and fuel pressure, as well as the oil level and quality, at least once a year. The air filter should be changed every 250 hours, and the drive belts should be checked for wear and tear. Both combine harvesters require maintenance and upkeep to remain operational. However, the main difference between the two models is in the level of complexity of the maintenance required. The Claas Lexion 8900 requires less complex maintenance tasks while the John Deere X9 requires more technical and involved maintenance tasks. In conclusion, while both harvesters need to be maintained regularly and adequately, the John Deere X9 requires more technical and involved maintenance tasks than the Claas Lexion 8900.
Claas Lexion 8900 Vs John Deere X9 Performance
Claas Lexion 8900
1. 360HP engine
2. 250 bushel grain tank
3. 13 ft.- manual reel
4. 40′ rigid draper header
5. Active Vibration Cleaning System
6. 30″ track spacing
7. Dual chaff spreader
John Deere X9
1. 410HP engine
2. 300 bushel grain tank
3. 16 ft.- PowerFold reel
4. 52′ flex draper header
5. High-Capacity, Low-Maintenance Twin Rotors
6. 26″ track spacing
7. High-Capacity SpreadPlus System
The Claas Lexion 8900 and John Deere X9 are two powerful combines optimized for the special needs of modern agriculture. When comparing the two models, the John Deere X9 offers an upgraded engine, a larger grain tank and a larger, more flexible draper header; this is well-suited to farms that require a wider cutting path and more efficient grain picking. The Claas Lexion 8900 offers a smaller grain tank and manual reel, but has a more advanced grain cleaning system, 30″ track spacing and dual chaff spreaders. Both models provide the power and performance required for modern farming operations. In conclusion, the John Deere X9 will provide the efficiency and versatility that large farming operations need, while the Claas Lexion 8900 will be the ideal choice for growers with more limited acreage who require a combination of power and advanced grain cleaning capabilities.
What are They Best For
The Claas Lexion 8900 is a high capacity forage harvester designed for harvesting hay and alfalfa, maize, wheat and other chopped forage crops. Its distinctive, easy-to-use cutting system provides quick and efficient results while reducing fuel consumption. Its short wheelbase helps maneuver in tight spaces and increases transport efficiency. It also features adjustable crop dividers to ensure the best possible results in uneven terrain.
The John Deere X9 is a multi-function harvesting machine designed for any crop, terrain and row length. Its integrated design makes it an ideal choice for farms and large field operations. It features a large 8-row harvesting header, onboard shaker and chopper options, as well as adjustable header crop dividers and rollers. Its powerful engine and adjustable speed control make this machine an excellent choice for any harvesting job.
When comparing the Claas Lexion 8900 and the John Deere X9, it really depends on what you are looking for in your combine harvester. The Claas Lexion 8900 is used for large scale farming and has a range of powerful harvesting technology to optimize crop yields. It offers more efficient grain handling and higher capacity threshing, making it an excellent choice for large grain farms. The John Deere X9 offers more maneuverability and higher fuel economy, making it a good fit for smaller scale farming operations. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the needs of the farm and the goals of the operator.